Knowledge-base assistants
Search approved policies, manuals and documents with retrieval-augmented generation and source references.
Turn company documents and approved business data into practical AI assistants. We design retrieval, model integration and review workflows around the questions your team actually needs to answer.
Search a policy, draft a response or find a record. Start with one clear use case and an agreed way to measure whether it helps.
Search approved policies, manuals and documents with retrieval-augmented generation and source references.
Evaluate local or hosted models against data requirements, available infrastructure and operating budget.
Build conversational interfaces with clear limits, escalation paths and human handover.
Connect to supported CRM, helpdesk and internal APIs with scoped access and approval rules.
Test representative questions first. Consider fine-tuning only when the task and available data justify it.
Document how to use, review and maintain the assistant—including when not to rely on its output.
A model is one part of the system. Source quality, permissions, retrieval and response checks determine whether the experience is useful for your team.
A representative RAG workflow for internal business knowledge.
Find relevant passages from your knowledge index
Use retrieved context, cite sources, flag uncertainty
For teams searching policies, manuals or internal documentation. Retrieval-augmented generation supplies relevant source material to the model so answers can point back to evidence.
How do I submit a purchase request?
The purchasing guide lists the request and approval steps.
AI output needs review. Sources and permissions matter.
For organisations evaluating on-premise, private-cloud or hosted models. We compare capability, operating cost and infrastructure needs against your data-handling requirements.
Follow the information from input to outcome.
For service and support teams answering repeated questions. A chatbot needs a defined scope, a maintained knowledge source and a clear handover when it cannot help.
Can I update a submitted request?
I can help locate the request policy or hand this to your team.
AI output needs review. Sources and permissions matter.
For teams preparing summaries, responses or internal documents. We build workflows that use the right source material and put review before publication or delivery.
For use cases where a baseline model, prompts and retrieval do not meet an agreed need. We assess the data and test whether additional training is justified.
For workflows where the model needs approved access to business tools. We define what it may read, what requires permission and when a person must confirm an action.
Follow the information from input to outcome.
Agree users, sources, limits and a representative test set.
Review document quality, access rules and update ownership.
Test retrieval and responses against expected answers and failure cases.
Train users, monitor usage and improve with reviewed feedback.
No. We compare hosted and local options against confidentiality needs, model capability, infrastructure and cost. The choice is made during discovery.
Yes. Source retrieval and evaluation can reduce errors, but do not eliminate them. Important outputs need appropriate human review and clear escalation.
Yes, subject to your permission and the source format. We plan access controls, indexing, updates and deletion so the knowledge stays manageable.
Not necessarily. Good prompts, retrieval and workflow design may be sufficient. We evaluate a baseline before recommending additional training.